Sen. Colby Coash
District 27

Special Session Update

November 4th, 2011

We are currently working on an update with information regarding the Pipeline. If you would like to see the bills that have been submitted, please click on the links below.

 

LB1 – http://www.nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/Current/PDF/Intro/LB1_S1.pdf

LB3- http://www.nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/Current/PDF/Intro/LB3_S1.pdf

LB4- http://www.nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/Current/PDF/Intro/LB4_S1.pdf

LB5- http://www.nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/Current/PDF/Intro/LB5_S1.pdf

 

Thank you to those who have contacted our office – we appreciate hearing from you.

 

Senator Colby Coash

District 27

 

New map of Legislative District 27

June 29th, 2011

This is the new map for Legislative District 27. If you have questions please feel free to call my office at 402-471-2632 or email me at ccoash@leg.ne.gov

Thank you,

Senator Colby Coash
Legislative District 27

Map of District 27

Office Change

January 6th, 2011

Our office has moved to room 2028, which is located on the west side of the State Capitol on the second floor.

Our phone number has remained the same: 402-471-2632

Please feel free to give us a call or stop by if you’re in the Capitol.

Lancaster County Senators Town Hall

November 5th, 2010

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

November 5, 2010

Contact: Sheila Page, 402-471-2632

The Lancaster County Delegation will be hosting a town hall meeting on November 17, 2010.  Senators Kathy Campbell, Colby Coash, Danielle Conrad, Tony Fulton, Ken Haar, Amanda McGill and Norm Wallman will be present.

LOCATION: LPS District Office, 5901 “O” Street (Board Room)

DATE: Wednesday, November 17, 2010

TIME: 5 PM to 8 PM

SCHEDULE:

5-6:30 PM: Discussion on Child Welfare- Due the impending changes and the citizens’ expressed concerns regarding the administration of child welfare services in Nebraska, we welcome a dialogue with our constituents on this matter.

6:30-8 PM: Open

Interim

September 30th, 2010

Large Budget Deficit means tough decisions.

The pending budget deficit of 680 MILLION over the next 2 years is the big gorilla in the room.  He’s mean, and he will take the State’s collective wisdom and effort in order get him out.   To put another way, if we spend the way we are projected to, we will be short by $680 million.   We don’t have enough income to meet our current spending obligations.

Some history:  We didn’t have enough money last year either.  The State used a significant amount of Federal Stimulus money to plug its last budget gap in the last budget.  This, coupled with a reduction in spending, transfer of cash funds, and some dip into the cash reserve still didn’t balance our budget.  We cut spending during the last session and again during a special session.  Most agencies, the University, and State Aid to Schools took an across the board cut from 5-7% total.  In addition, there was no growth in spending for those agencies who did not take cuts.  (Non-affected agencies included those tied to public safety and care for people in 24 hour settings).

The other side:  Nothing from the Federal Government comes for free.  Some of the federal stimulus money we accepted required us to increase spending in order to get the money.  We built the budget using the stimulus money and the corresponding increases.  Now the Federal money is gone, but the ongoing spending initiatives remain.  Unless changed by statute in the upcoming session, these spending requirements will remain while the funding will disappear.  Many of these spending initiatives grew programs by ten percent or more.

Choices will be tough.  As policy makers, we are bound by the State Constitution to balance the budget.  (Some wish the feds would have the same requirement).  To do this, I have three options available to me.

1)      Raise taxes (income, sales, or both) to meet the revenue needs of current spending.

2)      Cut spending to match the income.

3)      Use savings (Cash Reserve) to make the difference.

4)      A combination of these.

What the Legislature is doing:  The legislature is in the process of using an ad hoc committee through Legislative Resolution 542 to use the committee system to examine what cuts to the programs under its purview will look like.  For example, as a member of the Judiciary Committee, I am looking at budgets for the Court System and State Corrections.  This will not take the place of the Governor’s responsibility to submit a budget or the Appropriations Committee to craft a budget.  We are using the interim to study the agencies under our collective jurisdiction.  As subject matter experts we are in the best position to make recommendations with regard to impact of budget cuts.

My take:  I don’t see how I could justify raising taxes.  Families across my district and across this State have tightened their belt.  They are spending less.  Shouldn’t government have to do the same?  Cutting spending is not any easier.  Every function of government has some importance to someone.  Cutting spending to something means a service or aid to someone (i.e. childcare subsidy) is reduced.  There is a reason every program is in place.

The last budget cycle saw two rounds of “across the board” budget cuts.  In effect, we asked agencies to do the same with less appropriated money.  This, in effect, hurts all agencies, but hurts the ones who were operating efficiently to begin with.  Further “across the board” cuts will only hurt those entities that are already operating well.  I do not believe we can continue to ask government to do more with less.  Instead we have to ask government to do less with the money we have.  We are going to have to decide which functions of government are higher priorities than others.  We’ll have to make the decision to cut entire programs so that remaining programs can function.  This will be difficult.

I am interested in hearing your feedback on the upcoming budget. Please feel free to send me an email ccoash@leg.ne.gov and let me know what you think.

The 101st Legislature, Second Session

January 8th, 2010

As we start the 2010 session, I want to share a few themes that I believe will color the tone of this short session.

Budget:  There will be little to no room for additional State spending. Even with the large cut in spending from the Special Session, there is concern that once again the State’s need to spend will outstrip its ability to tax.  I am optimistic that the economy will recover and additional cuts will not be necessary.  There is no will (myself included) with the Legislative body to ask for more tax money from citizens.  Like you, Government must do what it can with what it has.  I am of the opinion that we have shrunk government about as close as we can without completely eliminating programs or consolidating them.  More shrinkage of government cannot come without job loss.  Did you know that our State Patrol officers are now at levels they were in 1985.  Here are a few ideas floating around:

1)      Give the University authority over State colleges.

2)      Combine the Auditor and Treasure’s office.

3)      Combine the dept. of Roads and the Dept. of Aeronautics into the Dept. of Transportation.

Bills in this session with a fiscal note (money needed) will have a tough fight at best and have little chance of enactment.  I do support a continued examination of Sales Tax exemptions.

Jobs:  The focus of this Legislature should continue to focus on job creation through economic development.  I have two proposals that are aimed at promoting small business tourism in Nebraska.  Tourism is our number 3 industry and should be given the attention as such.  (Agriculture and Manufacturing are # 1 & 2).

Social issues:  With budgetary legislation taking a back seat, there will be more room in this session to address social issues.  I continue to monitor behavioral health initiatives brought on by the “Safe Haven” problems of 2008.  Gambling, sex offenders, drunk drivers, and the foster care are just a few examples of legislation to be debated this session.  I am monitoring progress at the Beatrice State Developmental Center very closely.  Preliminary reports indicate things are going much better, however it is too early to tell if substantial and significant changes are happening and sustainable.

Senator Colby Coash

District 27

Interim

July 1st, 2009
Reflections on the first Session

The first session of the 101st Legislature went by quickly. As a new senator, I had quite a learning curve. It wasn’t long before I was right in the middle of some important issues facing our State. As a Body, we passed a balanced budget without raising taxes, funded education, and addressed behavioral health needs for children. I am proud of the work we accomplished, but know there is much work to be done. Here are some of the issues we addressed in the three standing committees upon which I sit.

Judiciary committee: we deliberated many passionate issues including the death penalty method, fathers’ rights, gun rights, immigration, judicial resources, and youth violence.

General Affairs: we addressed expanded gambling in the state’s horse tracks, drinking State parks, and liquor control authority.

Urban Affairs: While not as high profile, the Urban Affairs committee addressed some needed changes to natural gas infrastructure. In addition we looked at annexation issues.

There were almost 700 bills heard this year and I heard from many constituents on a variety of topics. I would like to say thank you to all of the wonderful constituents of Legislative District 27 who took their time to contact me with their input, concern, and ideas. Below is a highlight of some of the issues that I heard about most frequently during the first session:

Death penalty: The testimony and correspondence on this issue were some of the most difficult I encountered this year. I believe most people wanted to see a finality to this issue. Most of the correspondence I received was in favor of repealing the death penalty. The Judiciary committee could not find a non-arbitrary, fair way to implement the death sentence. LB 36 was the best the committee could do after exhaustive research. Unfortunately, the Death Penalty cannot be administered fairly in our State. Issues such as location of the crime and moral beliefs of the prosecutor can result in an uneven Death Penalty prosecution. In the end, I supported the Death Penalty repeal. As the recent legal challenge illustrates, I believe this issue is far from resolved. From a fiscal standpoint of numerous appeals, I hope to see the day Nebraska saves money and protects its citizens by putting away the worst of the worst for the rest of their lives.

Children’s behavioral health: Last year’s safe haven discussion illustrated the need to do more in our state to address the behavioral health needs of Nebraska’s children. LB 603 was a small step in addressing, among other things, needs though the increased SCHIP coverage and the establishment of the hotline. We have much to do in this area and work remains.

As a new member of the Children’s behavioral health task force, I hope to bring my experience with child welfare into play in finding more solutions.

Judges: I introduced a bill this year to increase the number of judges based on the Judicial Resource Committee recommendations. In the end, a bill was signed by the Governor giving one more Dist. Judge to Lancaster County to take effect in 2011. Justice delayed is justice denied and I feel that adding this judge was the right thing to do.

Sexually Oriented Business regulation: As a member of the General Affairs Committee, I was able to participate in the hearing on LB 443. While I appreciated the intent of the bill, there are a number of questions about the definitions contained in the bill as well as enforcement. At this time, I remain unconvinced that the problems this bill is trying to address are, in fact, addressed through LB 443. On a related note, you may be interested in a bill I supported and was approved by the Governor on May 22nd. It gives counties the authority to enact and enforce ordinances on a number of issues important to public safety. As amended, LB 532 allows counties to regulate by ordinance issues including the “violation of the public peace and good order of the county by disorderly conduct, lewd or lascivious behavior, or public nudity.” LB 532 also allows county boards to enact ordinances to regulate sexually oriented businesses in a manner that represents local views.

Gun enforcement: As a gun rights supporter and a recreational shooter, I was supportive of both LB 503 and LB430. I believe the amendments to LB503 strengthened the bill and made reasonable compromises. I was happy to see that LB430 cleared away some of the problems with the patchwork and confusing nature of local opt outs. Some people wrote to express their concern that the amendments put on by the committee did not solve this problem. This is because the original bill addressed all possession of firearms. It now only addresses conceal carry laws. I am also pleased that service men from out of state who reside here in Nebraska will have reciprocity. I am happy to report that both bills were approved by the Governor at the end of May.

BSDC: I heard from many of you about the challenges faced with BSDC. As many of you know, I work in the field of developmental disabilities and have worked hard with the HHS committee and the LR 11 committee to find solutions to these issues. As a new member of the oversight committee I will have an even bigger role in addressing these issues. This will be a top priority of our office in the coming year. Our State can do better by the people with disabilities who are entrusted to our care.

These are just some of the issues that I heard about over the past five months. I would like to say thank you to all of those wonderful constituents of Legislative District 27 who took their time to contact me with their input, concerns and ideas. I look forward to hearing from you on other issues in the future. I am committed to an open office. We are happy to assist you in any way, and encourage you to keep in touch.

______________________________________________________________
Moving forward

Nebraska really is the “good life”. I am amazed at how well our State has done in light of the National economic situation. While other States were cutting budgets, we were able to fund our programs. While other States had to raise taxes, we did not. The health of our State is a reflection of the values we share.

The people of District 27 work hard to provide for themselves and their families. They did not take out loans they couldn’t afford. They help their neighbors when in need and exemplify true community. I am optimistic about our future, while at the same time realize there is work to be done.

I will continue to work on ways to support job development and the maintenance of an affordable way of life. I am proud of our State and am working to promote it to the rest of the Country. We have much to offer and our people are our greatest resource.

In closing, as your State Senator I am humbled to work for you. I want to know what I can do to assist you and your family and hope you will contact me anytime.

Sincerely,

Colby Coash

Sen. Coash revs up for the Unicameral

March 2nd, 2009

This senator’s early love of cars was the key to his first involvement with the Legislature. Thirteen-year-old Bassett native and future state Sen. Colby Coash took a job at a local restaurant.

“The whole goal was to wash dishes to earn money for a car,” Coash said. “I was probably earning $3.50 an hour. It was a terrible job.”

His dream ran off-course, however, when his employer proposed cutting his hours in anticipation of a law before the Legislature that would limit the number of hours teens were allowed to work.

Coash returned home and shared his woes with his father, who then facilitated what would be the future senator’s first interaction with state government.

“Rather than saying, ‘Well that’s just tough — that’s the way it is,’ he got on the phone with our state senator,” Coash said. His father gave him the phone and instructed him to explain his situation.

Subsequently, the bill threatening Coash’s dream of purchasing a car failed to pass.

Twenty years later, Coash is still involved in legislative issues and still appreciates his cars, which he drives to cars shows with his wife, Rhonda. He said his prized vehicle is the first classic car he purchased: a banana-yellow 1974 Corvette Stingray.

Not all of Coash’s interests are fueled with gasoline, however. The son of an agronomist, he enjoys planting and gardening — especially mint, which he uses in mint juleps served at his annual Kentucky Derby party. The gardener also enjoys heavy metal music.

His passion for all things fast will come in handy as he juggles his role as a Nebraska state senator with his work for a disability services agency. While he said the work pulls him in many directions, both jobs share a commonality.

“My life is not necessarily my own anymore. I share my time with my constituents and the state,” Coash said. “My work was already in advocacy for people with disabilities, so in a lot of ways, my public service is just an extension of my work”

The senator’s life is about to shift into high gear, however, as he and his wife are expecting their first child.

“I found out that I was going to be a senator and a dad in the same couple of weeks. So it’s been a big year for my wife and me,” Coash said.

LANCASTER COUNTY TOWN HALL MEETING

February 9th, 2009

Friday, February 13, 2009
12:00 pm — 1:00 pm

State Capitol
Room 1023

with
MAYOR CHRIS BEUTLER

Senators:
Bill Avery
Kathy Campbell
Colby Coash
Tony Fulton
Ken Haar
Amanda McGill
Danielle Nantkes
Norm Wallman

Questions: (402) 471.2633 or nkanne@leg.ne.gov