The content of these pages is developed and maintained by, and is the sole responsibility of, the individual senator's office and may not reflect the views of the Nebraska Legislature. Questions and comments about the content should be directed to the senator's office at tbrewer@leg.ne.gov
Senator Tom Brewer
43rd District
4-26-2019
LB 289 is a bill from Sen. Lou Ann Linehan. She chairs the Revenue Committee. It is one of about twenty different bills a variety of Senators have introduced this session that address property taxes this session. A combined hearing of the Revenue, Education and Retirement Committees was held on LB 289 this past Wednesday. The hearing went on until 11:00pm. Most of the people testified in opposition to it because the bill raises sales tax 3/4 of a cent, and it does away with certain sales tax exemptions. Also this week, the Governor published an editorial in the paper that voiced his strong opposition to the bill calling it a “tax shift” from property tax to sales tax.
I am carefully evaluating LB 289. There is over $550 million of property tax relief in this bill. I have not seen this much money in a proposal to lower property taxes since I have been in the legislature. If history is any guide, I never will again. The bill does away with the Property Tax Credit fund, which right now is the best guaranteed way agriculture property receives what little relief they do get. The bill certainly is a tax shift, but shifting some of the funding responsibility for our K–12 schools off of property taxes and onto the Legislature to plan for is absolutely essential and long overdue. As things are, I see a troubling and growing disconnect between the folks who mandate by law what the school districts must do (the Legislature) and the folks who have to pay for most it (the property tax payers).
Nebraska is currently 44th in the country in terms of state funding for K–12 schools. Forty-three other state legislatures appropriate a bigger portion of the funding for schools than we do in Nebraska. We have a huge over-reliance on property taxes to fund schools, and that is the main reason we are in the mess we are in. Myself and maybe twenty other Senators would gladly slash the state budget and use the savings to “pay” for property tax relief. Sadly, that is not a viable option. The majority of the Senators in the body would not support this approach.
School spending in Nebraska has also increased dramatically over the years, out-pacing inflation and other government spending. There is no constitutional limit to how much property taxes can be used to fund schools, so there is nothing stopping this problem from continuing to get worse. LB 289 addresses many of these problems.
Exactly how these and other aspects of the plan are addressed is the issue. The devil is always in the details. What measures may help agriculture property tax payers, and be good for small, rural schools can “hurt” the urban areas and the big Omaha and Lincoln schools, and the reverse can be true, too.
Property tax relief is the most important issue before the Legislature. It should have been LB 1. It should have been the first bill voted out of committee and the first bill we debated and passed. We need to resolve our differences, address these important concerns, and pass property tax relief for Nebraska. It will continue to be my primary focus this legislative session.
Please contact my office with any comments, questions or concerns. Email me at tbrewer@leg.ne.gov, mail a letter to Sen. Tom Brewer, Room #1423, P.O. Box 94604, Lincoln, NE 68509, or call us at (402) 471-2628.
Streaming video provided by Nebraska Public Media