The content of these pages is developed and maintained by, and is the sole responsibility of, the individual senator's office and may not reflect the views of the Nebraska Legislature. Questions and comments about the content should be directed to the senator's office at dmurman@leg.ne.gov
SENATOR MURMAN’S LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
January 21, 2022
This year, I have designated LB 723 as my priority bill for the session. Each senator is allowed one priority bill during each session. This bill was introduced by Senator Tom Briese of Albion, District 41.
LB 1107 from 2020 created the refundable income tax credit, and as Senator Briese has stated, LB 723 intends to protect at least $173 million dollars in property tax relief in 2024 by eliminating the requirement that the available dollars be lowered to $375 million.
Since we’ve seen a growth in state tax receipts, the amount of tax credits available to Nebraska taxpayers should not be restricted. It would not be prudent for us, as collectors of the taxes, to restrict this credit now with tax receipts coming in much higher than expectations and the cash reserve more than fully funded.
Valuations on family homes, businesses and family farms are going up, and the property taxes citizens are forced to pay are also increasing. With inflation and the cost of everything going up, this tax relief is of extreme importance to Nebraska taxpayers. When the state has sufficient funds, excess money needs to be returned to the people.
Senators have been elected for decades promising property tax relief as a top priority. LB 1107 last year finally achieved measurable relief. A broken tax system has continued to get more out of whack as a confusing Nebraska Tax Equity and Educational Opportunities Support Act (TEEOSA) formula dramatically increased taxes; first on farmland over ten years ago, and then to family homes the last two years or so. The result is that now both agriculture and homeowners are overburdened. We should be talking about increasing property tax relief, not just trying to maintain the relief that has finally been achieved.
I welcome any comments, questions or ideas you may have on this or any other issue. Please feel free to email me at dmurman@leg.ne.gov or call my office at 402-471-2732.
(LB 723 advanced to Select File on January 27th.)
SENATOR MURMAN’S LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
January 14, 2022
On Wednesday, January 5th we kicked off the second session of the 107th Nebraska Legislature. We welcomed Governor Ricketts and First Lady Susanne Shore to the Norris Chamber this past Thursday for the governor’s State of the State address. I have some important legislation that I am proposing this session, and I plan to share information about some of the bills I am introducing over the coming weeks.
The unfortunate closing of the Arapahoe nursing home has highlighted the need for more healthcare providers in greater Nebraska. The difficulty in maintaining adequate staff was certainly a major factor contributing to the closure.
I have proposed a bill this session to modify the Rural Health Systems and Professional Incentive Act. My objective is to bolster rural healthcare by bringing in doctors, nurses, dentists, etc. Under the act, a healthcare professional may have their educational loans and other financial assistance repaid if they agree to practice in a “designated health profession shortage area” for at least three years. Currently, a local entity within this area is required to provide equal funding for the repayment of a recipient’s debt. The bill amends the act by saying a match would not be required by a local entity unless required by federal law. This change would allow the use of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA-federal funds) to match. My goal is to enhance the objectives of the act to promote rural health.
I would welcome any comments, questions or ideas you may have on this or any other issue. Please feel free to email me at dmurman@leg.ne.gov or call my office at 402-471-2732.
As 2021 draws to a close, I want to wish all of you a Happy New Year for 2022.
The next session of the Nebraska Legislature will begin Wednesday, January 5th. This will be a “short” 60-day session that is scheduled to end on April 20, 2022. A number of bills from last year that did not pass will “carryover” to this next session, and senators will have ten legislative days to introduce new bills.
A big area of interest for the coming session will be the use of federal stimulus dollars provided to Nebraska under the “American Rescue Plan Act of 2021” (ARPA) through multiple funding streams. While the total money eligible to be awarded to all 93 counties, 4 metro cities, 525 localities and the state is approximately $1.7 billion, the state has already received $520 million, with a similar payment to be made in 2022. The federal government requires that the funds be used to meet one of the following eligible uses: to support the public health response to COVID-19; to respond to negative economic impacts; to provide additional support/pay for essential workers and to improve water, sewer and broadband infrastructure. There have been a lot of ideas floating around as to how to spend this money, and I anticipate much of the time and energy of the upcoming session will be devoted to this topic. My thinking is that we must be careful to spend this money wisely. Since this represents a one-time transfer of funds, we must also be careful to spend the money on one time projects or programs that will sunset, rather than committing the state to funding various programs for years to come.
I will be honored to continue to serve on the Legislature’s Education and Health and Human Services Committees. Both of these committees do important work and face a multitude of challenges. With regard to the Education Committee, we need assurance that parents, as the primary stakeholders, have a strong say in their child’s education and are aware of what is being taught. The emphasis with the Health and Human Services Committee should be on children, the disabled, the elderly and veterans.
For Nebraska to succeed, a strong and growing workforce is essential. We need to incentivize everyone to work and provide opportunities for that to occur.
As always, I welcome any comments, questions or ideas you may have on this or any other issue. Please feel free to email me at dmurman@leg.ne.gov or call my office at 402-471-2732.
https://www.1011now.com/2021/11/19/nebraska-state-senators-climb-mount-kilimanjaro/
https://journalstar.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/senators-descend-from-mount-kilimanjaro-safe-and-sound/article_5eb7fb38-58fb-55d0-865a-d55622069e7f.html?fbclid=IwAR2WSt20zMA5odZSQBX9gpvVWeW9-MpqwGkoayK3aBlK7iXpUkgy37DXslc
Read the story…
https://omaha.com/eedition/sunrise/midlands/page-b4/page_488a4b51-6223-5953-a972-b739991b81f1.html
Fall is here. Crisp autumn evenings, the changing of the leaves, and the mad dash to get the crops out of the field. It can’t be said often enough—there is no place like Nebraska.
Some of the discussion during the recent special session on redistricting brought up what appears to be a growing divide between urban and rural areas of our state. In this frame of mind, Lincoln and everything east is considered “urban” and everything west of Lincoln is “rural”.
In order for our state to be as prosperous, efficient and successful as it has all the potential to be, this is a counter-productive way of thinking. A symbiotic relationship must be maintained with all of the industries in our state, whether they are agricultural, financial, industrial, insurance, technological, etc.
All of us in the state benefit from reasonably priced food, cheaper fuel through the use of renewables, and from the byproducts of production agriculture. According to the 2017 Economic Impact of the Nebraska Agricultural Production Complex from UNL’s Department of Agricultural Economics, “…between one-fifth and one-fourth of Nebraska’s economy can be attributed to the agricultural production complex. Few other states have an economy with this degree of agricultural prominence.” The study also found that “The total employment impact of the agricultural production complex was estimated to be 320,642 jobs in 2017, or 23.3% of total Nebraska employment.”
I can’t account for all of the reasons why Western Nebraska is diminishing in population. Our quality of life rivals, and I think in many areas exceeds that of the urban centers of any state. There are good people, great schools, exposure to the arts, access to technology and industry, and recreational opportunities. Common sense and traditional values are treasured in Nebraska, especially in rural Nebraska.
Often times when we send our children for higher education in a bigger city, they are drawn to the pace, culture and amenities urban life has to offer. Plus, television, movies and other media lay out the tantalizing allure of “bright lights and big city.” Many economic developers in central and western Nebraska are proactively recruiting new businesses and industries, and are working to combat the so-called “brain drain.” I wish them success in their endeavors. Additional efforts to enhance broadband telecommunications and other technologies will also help. We must make every effort to insure that citizens living great distances from Lincoln are not disenfranchised.
I would welcome any comments, questions or ideas you may have on this or any other issue. Please feel free to email me at dmurman@leg.ne.gov or call my office at 402-471-2732.
I think it is important to tell my constituents where I stand on Covid-19 vaccine and mask mandates. As you might imagine, I have received numerous calls and emails lately on this topic. There is great concern about federal overreach and the idea of being forced to do something that violates personal choice and possibly religious beliefs.
On September 9th, President Biden issued an executive order mandating Covid-19 vaccinations. According to the Associated Press:
Some employers such as Union Pacific Railroad in Omaha and 3M in Valley are saying they will lay off employees that choose not to get the vaccine. People have contacted me about tough decisions they may be forced to make regarding doing something that they do not want to do versus leaving a job they have held for years.
In the first session of the 107th Legislature, Senator Ben Hansen of Blair introduced LB 643. I am a cosponsor of this bill. The intention of the bill is “To maintain the individual liberty, parental rights, and free market principles of the citizens and businesses of Nebraska during a state of emergency declared by the Governor, or anytime thereafter, it is the right of each citizen, the right of parents with respect to their dependents, and the right of each business with respect to its employees, to accept or decline a mandatory vaccination directive by the Nebraska
state government. Declining a mandatory vaccination directive will deliver no implication, penalty, litigation, or punishment by the state to the citizen, parent, or business.” This bill was introduced early in the session, and we had no way of envisioning the subsequent actions of the Biden administration. The bill has been referred to the Health and Human Services Committee, of which I am a member. The language of the bill will likely be updated to reflect mandates from the federal government as well.
As you may have seen, there is talk of calling a special session to deal with this issue. I am in favor of this. However, the realities of a single-house legislature come to bear. Proponents of the mandates will likely filibuster any bill calling for personal choice, religious exemption, or any other proposal limiting the mandates. It takes a vote of 33 senators to end a filibuster. At this point, neither Governor Ricketts or Speaker Mike Hilgers believe there are enough senators willing to vote to overcome any filibusters.
In one of his recent legislative updates, Senator Steve Erdman of Bayard, my colleague and friend, said that “Vaccinations are a private healthcare matter between an individual and his or her physician. No government agency or employer has the right to make decisions about another person’s health. President Joe Biden’s vaccine mandate is unconstitutional and violates a person’s liberty, including his or her religious rights, privacy rights, and healthcare rights.” This is the stance I am taking as well, and this is what I will base any votes on, whether during a special session or in the regular session starting in January.
I would welcome any comments, questions or ideas you may have on this or any other issue. Please feel free to email me at dmurman@leg.ne.gov or call my office at 402-471-2732.
As you know, we have just concluded the special legislative session to draw new boundary lines for the districts of five elected and one appointed group in our state; the House of Representatives, the Legislature, the Nebraska Public Service Commission, the State Board of Education, the University of Nebraska Board of Regents, and the Nebraska Supreme Court. This decennial process is required by both the United States and Nebraska Constitutions on the heels of a U.S. census.
“Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made.” That quote, attributed to 19th century German chancellor Otto von Bismarck, is a familiar and perhaps overly used saying. If you watched any of the debate during the special session, you saw how contentious, spirited and even silly some of the speeches on the floor can be. While the sausage quote was probably said tongue-in-cheek, it is one of those phrases we use that has some grains of truth. At the same time, as a member of our unique unicameral system, I heavily rely on the “second house” of our legislature, namely you, the citizens of our state, to keep a watchful eye on the process and help to keep lawmakers accountable. I appreciate all of the emails and phone calls I received from constituents regarding redistricting.
In order for there to be equal representation among the populous, each district is required by law to be similar in the number of persons living in it. Most of the redistricting was uncontested. The exceptions were for the three congressional districts and the forty-nine legislative districts.
For the 3rd U.S. Congressional District, the final compromise approved by the legislature moves Burt, Otoe, Thurston and Washington counties, as well as part of Polk County, into the district.
As I mentioned in my last update, my ideal was that Legislative District 38 could have remained the same. The final rendering of District 38 after redistricting, however brings Furnas, Harlan and Red Willow counties into the district. While I retain the city of Holdrege, the rest of Phelps County as well as Kearney County will be represented by Senator Halloran in District 33. Southwest Buffalo County will now be assigned to Senator Briese in District 41.
Be assured that I will continue to be available to the people who are no longer in the 38th District. I give a hearty welcome to and look forward to serving the new constituents from Harlan, Furnas, and Red Willow counties. I hope to make this as smooth a transition as possible.
I would welcome any comments, questions or ideas you may have on this or any other issue. Please feel free to email me at dmurman@leg.ne.gov or call my office at 402-471-2732.
Fall is in the air, harvest is approaching, and Husker football is on TV. Something that hasn’t happened for a while, besides Nebraska-Oklahoma football, is a special legislative session for redistricting.
Every ten years, based on data from the U.S. Census, Nebraska must draw new district maps to elect members of the Nebraska Legislature, the U.S. House of Representatives, the Nebraska Public Service Commission, the University of Nebraska Board of Regents, the State Board of Education and to appoint Judges to the Nebraska Supreme Court. The reason a special session had to be called this year is because of a delay in collection and dissemination of census data caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This special session will be condensed and is expected to wrap up by the end of the month.
As you have no doubt seen in the media, the legislature’s redistricting committee has presented several maps that will be used as a framework for the entire body to debate. Although it is not intended to be, historically this has been a partisan and often contentious process. As you are aware if you watched any of the three hearings (one conducted in each congressional district), most people do not like change. In this case, they are used to the results of the boundaries of their legislative and congressional districts approved during redistricting in 2011, and have grown accustomed to particular voting precincts, city and county divisions, and their current representatives to appointed and elected offices.
My ideal would be that District 38 remain the same as it was three years ago when I ran for this seat, because you are the valued constituents that I was elected to represent. However, since the population is growing in eastern Nebraska and shrinking in the west, I know that it is unrealistic to think that there will not be some changes; both to District 38 as well as likely all the other legislative districts. My efforts during this special session will be to ensure that this will be a fair process that follows the established guidelines and protects, as much as possible, the interests of District 38 and the state as a whole.
I would welcome any comments, questions or ideas you may have on this or any other issue. Please feel free to email me at dmurman@leg.ne.gov or call my office at 402-471-2732.
Streaming video provided by Nebraska Public Media